Re: Discussion: Estimates of model accuracy
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:05 amI agree with what Č. Venclovas wrote - those were very wise remarks.
Furthermore, I don't agree with Arne wrote in the last post. I think how we evaluate QA predictions can influence a lot the direction of the field. And in my opinion QA could revolutionise not just structural bioinformatics, but also have a big influence in medicine, biotechnology and other downstream applications.
Also, I think RMSD is a horrible metric, even for relatively accurate models.
Furthermore, I don't agree with Arne wrote in the last post. I think how we evaluate QA predictions can influence a lot the direction of the field. And in my opinion QA could revolutionise not just structural bioinformatics, but also have a big influence in medicine, biotechnology and other downstream applications.
Also, I think RMSD is a horrible metric, even for relatively accurate models.