PFRMAT AL 
TARGET t0045 
AUTHOR 4139-4764-1095 
METHOD 1) Secondary structure was predicted with PHD and Predator. 
METHOD 2) We used a hidden markov model that predicts SCOP 
METHOD    classification based on sequence and secondary structure. 
METHOD 3) We also performed threading, using THREADER2 
METHOD    Since the HMM failed to make a significant prediction on 
METHOD    this target, the alignment below is the result from 
METHOD    threader, taking the predicted secondary structure into 
METHOD    account. 
MODEL 1 
REMARK The parent-none fields below really just indicate 
REMARK that the corresponding residue(s) are not aligned 
PARENT 1nhp 
M   1	T 339 
T   2	G 340 
P   3	I 341 
A   4	N 342 
I   5	E 343 
D   6	V 344 
L   7	M 345 
L   8	A 346 
K   9	Q 347 
K  10	K 348 
Q  11	L 349 
K  12	G 350 
I  13	K 351 
P  14	E 352 
F  15	T 353 
I  16	K 354 
L  17	A 355 
H  18	V 356 
T  19	T 357 
Y  20	V 358 
D  21	V 359 
H  22	E 360 
D  23	D 361 
P  24	Y 362 
N  25	L 363 
N  26	M 364 
Q  27	D 365 
G  38	F 366 
I  39	N 367 
D  40	P 368 
P  41	D 369 
N  42	K 370 
R  43	Q 371 
S  44	K 372 
F  45	A 373 
K  46	W 374 
T  47	F 375 
L  48	K 376 
L  49	L 377 
V  50	V 378 
A  51	Y 379 
E  52	D 380 
N  53	P 381 
G  54	E 382 
D  55	T 383 
Q  56	T 384 
K  57	Q 385 
L  59	I 386 
A  60	L 387 
C  61	G 388 
F  62	A 389 
V  63	Q 390 
L  64	L 391 
A  65	M 392 
T  66	S 393 
A  67	K 394 
N  68	N 400 
M  69	I 401 
L  70	N 402 
N  71	A 403 
L  72	I 404 
K  73	S 405 
K  74	L 406 
A  75	A 407 
A  76	I 408 
K  77	Q 409 
S  78	A 410 
I  79	M 412 
G  80	T 413 
V  81	I 414 
K  82	E 415 
K  83	D 416 
V  84	L 417 
E  85	A 418 
M  86	Y 419 
A  87	A 420 
D  88	D 421 
K  89	F 422 
D  90	F 423 
A  91	F 424 
A  92	Q 425 
Q  93	P 426 
K  94	A 427 
S  95	F 428 
T  96	W 432 
G  97	N 433 
Y  98	I 434 
L  99	I 435 
V 100	N 436 
G 101	T 437 
G 102	A 438 
I 103	A 439 
S 104	L 440 
P 105	E 441 
L 106	A 442 
G 107	V 443 
Q 108	K 444 
K 109	Q 445 
K 110	E 446 
TER 
END 
